The sentence and audio have a 'subject case marker or LIG' rather than tua or ta 'OBL' after a verb and before the NP is obviously a syntactic mistake. I do not know why.
masanliawliaw a patek imaza.
Free translation:
There are many kinds of iron nails here.
Word gloss:
masan-liaw-liaw: to have been many. The root is liaw 'many'in RED.
a: subject case marker
patek: iron nail. Synonymous with cima, kugi, kezkez.
It is odd to me that the sentence says sa rather than a before the noun because subject case markers, which are required by syntax in this case, in Paiwan are either a or ti. I do not know about the function of sa.
nu qemudjalj, patalav itjen tua bakicu a pililjililjing.
Free translation:
When it's raining, we put a bucket to catch water falling from the eaves.
Word gloss:
nu: if or when
q<em>udjalj: rain, AV
pa-talav: catch water. The root is talav 'catch water'.
itjen: we, 1st person PL NOM, clitic
tua: OBL
bakicu: bakits or bakic, water bucket, loanword from Japanese
a: LIG
pi-lilji-liljing: put under the eaves. pi- 'put in/on; do something'; the root is liljing 'tree shade, sunset glow'. I think eaves is an extended meaning.
Voice file:
From Raleigh Ferrell's Paiwan Dictionary (1982) and ILRDF Online Paiwan Dictionary bakic.
These are all words for horse in Paiwan. ba is a loanword from Minnan; uma is loanword from Japanese.
neka tjapacucunan a rigi i pasamaza tjanuitjen.
Free translation:
We do not see horses in our place. [Literally: Horse is not seen by us in the place of us.]
Word gloss:
neka: no, there is no, NEG
tja-pa-cu-cun-an: the state of us seeing something, literally. tja- 'our, 1st person PL GEN'; pa- 'to cause to be or occur'; the root is cun 'see' in RED; -an 'specific location in time; referent focus'.
a: subject case marker
rigi: horse
i: in or at, LOC
pa-sa-maza: to this direction or here. sa- 'go to / in direction of'; the root is maza 'here'.
tjanu-itjen: of us, towards us, by us, with us, 'us 1st person PL OBL'.
Voice file:
From Raleigh Ferrell's Paiwan Dictionary (1982), ILRDF Online Paiwan Dictionary rigi, and klokah uma/ema/ba.
This is intriguing. Why can't we be straightforward and just say 'we don't have horses here'. Instead, we need to say 'there is no our seeing of horse or horse is not of our seeing here'.
tjapacucunan is so complicated and beautiful! what does it say about Paiwan? I have to know.
neka a nia rigi imaza. Our horse is not here. This sentence means we have a horse, just the horse is not here but somewhere else. So how can you say horse is not a local species or is introduced in Paiwan?
ku-kan-ay: I will probably eat (there) (Ferrell, p. 60)
ku-qaljup-ay: I will probably hunt (there) (Ferrell, p. 17)
Word gloss:
ku: my, 1st person SIN GEN
Voice file:
From Raleigh Ferrell's Paiwan Dictionary (1982).
I actually think -aw is object focus while -ay is referent focus. What does it mean, in addition to the semantic difference on the object (thing being eaten or hunted) and the location (where eating or hunting takes place)? And I am reading simply by pronouncing the combination of etters. I either have never heard these words or do not remember them at all.